Health secrets the parachute companies DON’T want you to know about
November 4, 2008
Some people discourage you, telling you not to “reinvent the wheel.” Other people will give you too much encouragement, saying “build a better mousetrap and the world will beat a path to your door.” Do not listen to either of these people. Both are trying to distract you with nonsensical feedback while they secretly steal your inventions and race to the patent office. While its clear that I have an obvious mistrust for others concerning my inventions (potato chip clip AND TV remote combined), don’t let my negativity infect your science classroom.
Originally published few years back, this article by the BMJ (formerly the British Medical Journal) takes a rigorous look at one invention that is assumed to work just fine the way it exists: the parachute. Apparently, we’ve assumed parachutes to be a successful way of preventing death by “gravitational challenge” based purely on anecdotal evidence — there hasn’t been a single study that included controlled, randomized, double-blind parachute placebo groups. Without such a study, can we really know for sure that skydivers wouldn’t fare as well with a placebo instead of a parachute?
Their intent was to satirize criticisms about health interventions based off observational data by advocates who prefer evidence based findings. You, however, can use it with your students to spark an interest in challenging assumptions and looking at things from a different angle. While the article is tongue-in-cheek, it works on a fundamental level in that it is still an interesting, solid example for students trying to write a scientific research paper to see just how a scientific research paper gets written. Abstract, objective, data sources, citations—they are all in there. -NICK YINGLING
Related Stuff:
Instructifeature: Five Tips to Improve Students’ Information Evaluation
Photo credit: Library of Congress
I just ate the sticker off my granny smith apple. Well, to be more precise, I just ate about 3/4 of the sticker, and when I was taking the next bite, I saw the remaining bit. So I didn’t eat the whole sticker. But now I am left wondering which is more toxic — the pesticides no doubt used to make sure this delicious apple grew to be ginormous, or the sticker and its adhesive? I mean, they have to consider that one in 10 dummies will end up eating the sticker, right?
If you were jonesing for a list of lists to better your edification skills yesterday, I apologize. Nonetheless,
In recent years, a lot of schools have told their physical education programs to hit the showers. Greater emphasis on testing, budget cuts, and so on. But as school wallets get lighter, the children are 



I never read The DaVinci Code or saw the movie version, but I have a pretty good indication of what it’s all about. If you are a fan of either, then you’ll probably enjoy this Flash cartoon parody that employs talking animals in the roles of their human counterparts.
BBC presents the 
Better late than never, right folks? Sorry for the late post, but I had too much eggnog this weekend… Anywho, onward to the numbers!
If you need a daily jolt of caffeine and aren’t a coffee person, you might want to read this alarming article about what soda can do to you.
Personally, I love games. I like them more when they are challenging, insightful and educational.